Weening Strafrechtadvocaten - Wilhelminasingel 97

Dear lawyer !!!!

Top lawyer!

Very expert advice and action in court

They are helpful and even pro bono

Top lawyers with expert knowledge. Thank you very much for your efforts and thank you again for all the effort.

Herewith I would like to thank you very much for your efforts and advice in the criminal case of me at the police court in Maastricht. Mark Mulder.

Very solid and good lawyers you will be helped quickly and friendly ?

Very bad experience with this office that I want to save everyone from. case Advocaatkantoor has failed to properly publicly examine the evidence presented in the proceedings, after which it has failed to substantiate any factual and legal defenses on appeal. Subsequently, it was neglected to substantiate the cassation in good time or to state that despite the appeal in cassation no pleas were submitted, this with a sentence of up to 4 years and inadmissibility in cassation as a result. I had to start a disciplinary procedure in order to have professional errors established. In disciplinary proceedings it has been confirmed that the professional standard has been violated. However, to date there has been opposition from Weening Advocaten to recovery of damage due to the fact that professional errors are not properly recognized despite the judgment of the disciplinary court, i.e. contrary to the factual determination. Nothing is done to disclose or acknowledge professional errors and to properly acknowledge, investigate, repair or compensate the damage. In fact, it is counteracted in the event of recovery damage. This by not properly reporting the claim to legally required professional liability insurance and not properly releasing procedural documents/evidence for further substantiation of the claim. Which, in my opinion, concerns a subsequent breach of contract / wrongful act, because in a liability dispute as a result of breach of contract / wrongful act by acting contrary to the professional standard and contract for services, the violation of the code of conduct for the legal profession is still continued. As a result, compensation for expenses to determine, compensate and prevent more damage, pursuant to Article 6:69 of the Dutch Civil Code, is not forthcoming. As a result, claims for damages in accordance with legal regulations are counteracted. All this by the law firm that was supposed to safeguard and protect my rights.